Delivery architecture
Project shapes, hierarchies, and whether work can roll up to portfolio without manual repair.
Global MindsATLASSIAN ARCHITECTURE REVIEW
Thirty minutes with the Global Minds architects behind Atlassian programs in global retail, capital markets, telecom and pharma. We read your current setup, name the structural risks, and show you the sequence to fix them.
No deck. No tool demo. You leave with a written architecture read.
Architecture and governance programs delivered for
Farfetch
E-commerce

OLX Portugal
Marketplace

Hypera Pharma
Pharmaceutical

Euroclear
Financial services

Credito Agricola
Banking

Proximus
Telecom

Feedzai
Fintech and AI

Teya
Fintech

Euronext
Stock exchange

uCloud
Cloud

O2B
Observability and AIOps
They have a structure problem that shows up in Jira. These are the five symptoms we hear most often, and what is usually underneath them.
Reports leadership quietly doesn't trust.
What it usually isDelivery data spread across project shapes that were never designed to roll up.
Every new team wants a new project and a new workflow.
What it usually isNo architecture rules, so the tool absorbs every local preference.
Automations that break whenever something changes.
What it usually isAutomation compensating for structure that was never modeled.
A permission scheme nobody wants to touch.
What it usually isGovernance added after the fact instead of designed into the flow.
AI pilots that never leave the pilot.
What it usually isAI has nothing structured to read. Structure first, agents after.
None of these get fixed by configuring more. They get fixed by architecture.
Products, footprint, and how work actually enters and moves through your organization.
Where structure, governance and reporting are working against you, said plainly.
What to fix first, what to leave alone, and what needs a decision from leadership.
After the call
Within two business days you receive a one-page written read: three structural risks, the sequence we would follow, and what we would not touch.
Project shapes, hierarchies, and whether work can roll up to portfolio without manual repair.
Whether strategy is visible in the operating system, or only in the quarterly slides.
JSM, catalog, SLAs, knowledge, and the line between service work and delivery work.
Roles, schemes, decision rights and auditability, and what they cost you in speed.
What your automation is compensating for, and what it should be doing instead.
Data quality, workflow consistency and permissions as prerequisites, not features.
Global Minds is an Atlassian strategy architecture practice. The senior architects who designed and governed Atlassian programs for global retail, European capital markets, telecom and pharmaceutical operations are the ones who run these reviews.
Each review is conducted by a senior architect. A second architect reviews the written read before it reaches you, which is why it takes two days and not two hours.
Global Minds was founded by Breno Lima Ribeiro, Global Atlassian and Organizational Architect, and operates across Europe, the United States and Latin America.
Nine questions. We use the answers to prepare, so the review starts from your context instead of a blank page.
No. It's a review. We look at your architecture and tell you what we see. If it turns into work, that's a separate conversation, later, and you start it.
Because we would rather be judged on how we read an architecture than on a deck. It also tells us quickly whether we're the right fit for each other.
The person accountable for delivery or for the platform. Bring your Jira admin if you have one. They answer in thirty seconds what would otherwise take us a week to infer.
No. If you're comfortable sharing your screen, the read gets sharper. That's optional.
Especially then. Migration is the moment architecture decisions get locked in for years.
We use it to prepare the review and to contact you about it. We don't sell or share it. GDPR and LGPD apply.